-
US Woman Responds as Video Labeling Europe ‘Not First World’ Sparks Debate - 16 mins ago
-
BMW’s Neue Klasse SUV Sets New Benchmark in Sustainability - 19 mins ago
-
High-stakes clandestine poker world led to Hollywood Hills murder - 26 mins ago
-
More Home Run Derbies? MLB Teams Are Expanding on the All-Star Concept - 26 mins ago
-
Ultra-thin sound blocker cuts traffic noise dramatically - 28 mins ago
-
Trump’s envoy meets Putin ahead of Russia-Ukraine peace deadline - 47 mins ago
-
Orbán and the Great Russia-Gate Hoax - 56 mins ago
-
Tourist Stuck at Top of Stairs With Suitcase—Plan To Get Down Goes Viral - 56 mins ago
-
Jerry Jones Shares He Hasn’t Spoken With Micah Parsons Since Trade Request - about 1 hour ago
-
HUF 100 Billion Bought in One Week Amid Retail Investor Frenzy - 2 hours ago
Rwanda says it reaches a deal with U.S. to take in up to 250 migrants
The United States and Rwanda have agreed for the African country to potentially accept hundreds of migrants deported from the U.S., the spokesperson for the Rwandan government and an official told Reuters, as President Donald Trump’s administration takes a hardline approach toward immigration.
The agreement, under which Rwanda would accept up to 250 migrants, was signed by U.S. and Rwandan officials in Kigali in June, said the Rwandan official, speaking on condition of anonymity, adding that Washington had already sent an initial list of 10 people to be vetted.
“Rwanda has agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants, in part because nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement, and our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation,” said the spokesperson for the Rwandan government, Yolande Makolo.
“Under the agreement, Rwanda has the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement. Those approved will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade.”
The White House and State Department had no immediate comment. The Department of Homeland Security referred questions to the State Department.
President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally and his administration has sought to ramp up removals to third countries, including sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland.
Rwanda has in recent years positioned itself as a destination country for migrants that Western countries would like to remove, despite concerns by rights groups that Kigali does not respect some of the most fundamental human rights.
In May, the foreign minister said Rwanda was in the early stages of talks to receive immigrants deported from the United States.
The Trump administration argues that third-country deportations help swiftly remove some migrants, including those with criminal convictions. Immigration hardliners see third-country removals as a way to deal with offenders who cannot easily be deported and could pose a threat to the public.
Opponents have criticized the deportations as dangerous and cruel, since people could be sent to countries where they could face violence, have no ties and do not speak the language.
The Trump administration has pressed countries to take migrants. It deported more than 200 Venezuelans accused of being gang members to El Salvador in March, where they were jailed until they were released in a prisoner swap last month.
The Supreme Court in June allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without giving them a chance to show they could be harmed. But the legality of the removals is being contested in a federal lawsuit in Boston, a case that could potentially wind its way back to the conservative-leaning high court.
Rwanda signed an agreement with Britain in 2022 to take in thousands of asylum seekers, a deal that was scrapped last year by then newly-elected Prime Minister Keir Starmer. No one was sent to Rwanda under the plan because of years of legal challenges.
Source link