Judge says lawsuit over Buffalo Wild Wings boneless wings has “no meat on its bones”
4 hours ago
2,578
An Illinois judge ruled that a Buffalo Wild Wings customer’s lawsuit over the restaurant chain’s boneless chicken has “no meat on its bones.”
Aimen Halim sued Buffalo Wild Wings in 2023, alleging that its use of the term “boneless wings” is deceptive because it contains chicken breast meat. According to court documents, Halim ordered the “boneless wings” at an Illinois location in January 2023, expecting to receive “wings that were deboned.”
Had he known he was eating breast meat, Halim would have refused to buy the product or paid less, the documents say. Halim sought monetary damages.
On Tuesday, Judge John Tharp Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected Halim’s claims, riffing in his opinion that the plaintiff did not “drum” up enough facts to support his claim.
Tharp said the term “boneless wings” is not deceptive but rather a “fanciful name.” He wrote that words can have multiple meanings, using the example of “buffalo wing,” which he said “refers to the type of sauce on the wing, rather than indicating it is made of buffalo meat.”
“A reasonable consumer would not think that BWW’s boneless wings were truly deboned chicken wings, reconstituted into some sort of Franken-wing,” Tharp said.
Tharp also compared the item to cauliflower wings, another product sold at Buffalo Wild Wings, noting that a reasonable customer would not believe the dish is made from wing meat.
Later, in his opinion, Tharp stated that “boneless wings” is a common term that has been in use for over two decades and is familiar to customers.
Buffalo Wild Wings likewise said that a reasonable consumer would not be misled by the term “boneless wings” and that “context clues make it clear that the product cannot be made of wing meat,” the opinion says.
The restaurant chain and the plaintiff’s lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Tharp said Tuesday that Halim has until March 20 to file an amended complaint.
A legjobb élmény biztosítása érdekében olyan technológiákat használunk, mint a cookie-k az eszközadatok tárolására és/vagy eléréséhez. Ha beleegyezik ezekbe a technológiákba, akkor olyan adatokat dolgozhatunk fel ezen az oldalon, mint a böngészési viselkedés vagy az egyedi azonosítók. A hozzájárulás elmulasztása vagy visszavonása bizonyos funkciókat és funkciókat hátrányosan érinthet.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.