-
Fox News Entertainment Newsletter: Tom Hanks addresses daughter’s allegations, Keith Urban’s sobriety journey - 11 mins ago
-
World Cup qualifying: Haaland leads Norway to its first win vs. Italy in 25 years - 15 mins ago
-
One Million Drivers Told To Avoid Gas Stations - 27 mins ago
-
Jason Biggs opens up about desperate cocaine use at height of fame - 55 mins ago
-
Vikings’ Kevin O’Connell Speaks Out About Rumored Aaron Rodgers Interest - about 1 hour ago
-
Diamondbacks RHP Corbin Burnes will undergo Tommy John surgery - 2 hours ago
-
How to Watch Andorra vs England: Live Stream FIFA World Cup Qualifiers, TV Channel - 2 hours ago
-
DMV scam texts target drivers in 14 states with fake penalty threats - 2 hours ago
-
2025 Vikings game-by-game predictions: Will J.J. McCarthy prove to be right QB move? - 2 hours ago
-
Woman Buys 1963 Wedding Dress for $5 at Estate Sale—but There’s a Twist - 2 hours ago
White House Killed NASA Role to Punish Elon Musk, Isaacman Suggests
🎙️ Voice is AI-generated. Inconsistencies may occur.
Billionaire investor Jared Isaacman has suggested his sudden removal from the nomination process to be President Donald Trump‘s new NASA administrator could have been a way to punish Elon Musk.
In a new podcast interview, the private spaceflight investor and ally of Musk, said Trump’s withdrawal of support for his nomination last week might have been a shot across the bow at Musk, whose Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) worked to reduce the size of the federal government.
“But people also hate change—like, we all know this. And people can be very protective of their empire. And when somebody comes in—you know, Elon’s got a playbook, and I think he knows how to get things done,” Isaacman told The All-In Podcast in an episode released Wednesday.
“There were some people that had some axes to grind, and I was a good visible target.”
Isaacman said that he did not blame Trump for following the advice of his inner circle regarding the nomination when faced with so many decisions every day.
“He’s got to get a lot more right than wrong, so I don’t blame, you know, an influential adviser coming in and saying ‘look here’s the facts and I think we should kill this guy.’ The president’s got to make a call and move on. I think that’s exactly how it went.”
This is a developing story. More to follow.
John Raoux/ALLISON ROBBERT/AP Photo/AFP via Getty Images
Source link