-
49ers’ Trent Williams Explains Why Super Bowl Loss to Chiefs Doesn’t Matter - 35 mins ago
-
Indiana's Justice Ellison rushes for a five-yard touchdown vs. Nebraska - 37 mins ago
-
California foster dad sentenced to 7 years for abusing child torture victims - 43 mins ago
-
Boeing workers to vote next week on a new proposal that could end strike - 54 mins ago
-
Fox News Entertainment Newsletter: Bethany Joy Lenz’s cult escape, Liam Payne’s cause of death revealed - about 1 hour ago
-
GMA Co-Host Michael Strahan’s Daughter Shares ‘Wellness Reminder’ With Twin Sister - about 1 hour ago
-
Hoosier HC Curt Cignetti breaks down how he turned Indiana's program around | Big Noon Kickoff - about 1 hour ago
-
Mail carriers reach tentative contract with USPS that includes pay raises, air-conditioned trucks - 2 hours ago
-
Rosie O’Donnell’s eldest daughter Chelsea arrested for child neglect - 2 hours ago
-
North Korea Threatens To Declare War With South Korea - 2 hours ago
Single-family landlord Invitation Homes misled renters, the FTC alleged
Invitation Homes, the nation’s largest single-family landlord, has agreed to pay $48 million to settle a handful of allegations, including that it illegally charged undisclosed junk fees, withheld tenant security deposits and engaged in unfair eviction practices.
The settlement was announced Tuesday by the Federal Trade Commission. Among the main allegations made by the FTC was Invitation Homes deceived tenants over the total cost of renting one of its homes.
The company, which owns or manages more than 100,000 homes nationwide, including more than 11,000 in California, did not include mandatory “junk” fees when advertising its rental rates, according to the FTC.
These fees — for things like smart home technology and utility management — at times raised the cost of rent by more than $1,700 a year and were only disclosed when consumers went to sign their lease, the FTC alleged.
By that time, the agency said consumers were in a bind because they had already paid a nonrefundable application fee of up to $55. They may have also forked over $500 to reserve a specific home, which they would only get back if they signed the lease.
Sometimes, consumers weren’t made aware of the junk fees until after they signed the lease and moved in, authorities said.
In addition to junk fees, the FTC alleged Invitation Homes rented out homes that were often in disrepair and systematically withheld security deposits for items that were not the tenant’s responsibility.
Invitation Homes also engaged in several unfair eviction practices, the agency said. Among them, the company told struggling tenants during the pandemic that their only options were to pay, move out or face eviction and failed to inform them of federal eviction protections available at the time, the FTC alleged.
“No American should pay more for rent or be kicked out of their home because of illegal tactics by corporate landlords,” Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina M. Khan said in a statement. “The FTC will continue to use all our tools to protect renters from unlawful business practices.”
In a news release, Invitation Homes said it made no admission of wrongdoing as part of the settlement and described its disclosures and practices as “industry leading.”
“Today’s agreement brings the FTC’s three-year investigation to a close and puts this matter behind the Company, which will, as always, move forward with its continuous efforts to better serve its customers and enhance its practices,” Invitation Homes said in a statement.
The company, which started buying thousands of homes in the wake of the Great Recession, has reached multiple settlements this year.
In July, it agreed to pay nearly $20 million to resolve allegations it made unpermitted renovations across its portfolio in California. In January, it agreed to pay several million to settle allegations it violated the state’s rent cap law.
Under the settlement announced Tuesday, which still must be approved by a judge, consumers would receive refunds and Invitation Homes will be required to include all mandatory monthly fees in its advertised rent.
Source link