-
Florida man allegedly slashed 13-year-old boy’s neck in random boardwalk attack - 19 mins ago
-
Mark Zuckerberg testifies in L.A. trial over social media addiction - 32 mins ago
-
New Ravens OC Declan Doyle: Lamar Jackson Has ‘Even Higher Ceiling to His Game’ - 42 mins ago
-
Friends suspected in woman’s death after she’s found dead in the lake at a wakeboarding festival - about 1 hour ago
-
Russian Skater Slams Olympic Judges for ‘Unprofessional’ Scoring - about 1 hour ago
-
In Paris and London, police open up new probes into Epstein files - about 1 hour ago
-
A Super Bowl Sale: Seahawks Announce They’ve Begun Process of Selling Team - about 1 hour ago
-
What ‘Slop’ Means and Why Your Social Media Feels Noisier - 2 hours ago
-
Woman stabs father-in-law to death before taking selfie - 2 hours ago
-
bet365 Bonus Code FOX365 Scores $150 in Bonus Bets for USA Hockey’s Quarter Final - 2 hours ago
USC rejects Trump education compact aimed at shifting the university to the right
The University of Southern California had rejected the controversial education compact the Trump administration offered it and eight other schools.
USC interim President Beong-Soo Kim said in a statement that he had sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Education turning down the Trump offer, which would give priority funding access to universities that agree to follow the president’s mostly conservative vision of higher education.
“I appreciate the various points of view shared with me by many members of our community. Although USC has declined to join the proposed Compact, we look forward to contributing our perspectives, insights, and Trojan values to an important national conversation about the future of higher education,” Kim said in a statement.
His letter, which USC provided to The Times, was addressed to Education Secretary Linda McMahon and said that the compact “raises a number of issues worthy of further discussion within both higher education and our nation.”
The compact had been strongly rejected by the USC Academic Senate, which on Oct. 6 met and heard from 20-plus professors, department heads and others who spoke out against the document. In forceful speeches during the virtual meeting, participants called the compact “egregiously invalid,” “probably unconstitutional,” “antithetical to principles of academic freedom” and “a Trojan horse.”
This is a developing story.
Source link











